Whistleblower Lawyer Quoted About Comey’s Leak to the Press

 

An article in the Washington Examiner titled Is James Comey in trouble for ‘leaking’ his own notes? quotes whistleblower lawyer Jason Zuckerman about whether Mr. Comey’s disclosures to The New York Times could land him in hot water.

The article notes that leaking government information can be punishable under the Espionage Act and other laws governing the dissemination of confidential government data or information.

Zuckerman told the Examiner that Mr. Comey had a “First Amendment right to leak information about what he reasonably perceived as unlawful conduct” by Trump, noting that there is no allegation that Mr. Comey disclosed confidential or highly sensitive information.

In addition, though Mr. Comey is not covered under the whistleblower law that protects FBI employees (because he was an appointee serving at the pleasure of the President), his disclosures would be protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act in that they entail an alleged abuse of authority.

Arguably, part of Mr. Comey’s memo is not even a government record because it documents a job interview with President Trump, not a discussion of official agency business.  According to Mr. Comey’s June 8th testimony, President Trump told Mr. Comey at a private dinner at the White House on January 27th that Mr. Comey must pledge his loyalty in order to remain FBI Director.  Mr. Comey also testified that at a February 14th meeting in the Oval Office, President Trump suggested to Mr. Comey that he should drop the investigation of Mr. Flynn.

According to press accounts, President Trump’s personal attorney has threated to sue Mr. Comey or file a complaint with the DOJ Office of Inspector General.  This threat is troubling because it sends a signal to federal employees that blowing the whistle about fraud, waste or abuse could lead to a retaliatory investigation or liability in a civil lawsuit.  Leaking classified information is unlawful and not protected under the whistleblower laws.  Such leaks should be condoned because they put intelligent sources at risk and can damage U.S. national security.  But lawful disclosures protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act should not punished and should not be discouraged.  As Zuckerman argued in a recent article that he co-authored with Tom Devine of the Government Accountability Project, Draining the Swamp Requires Robust Whistleblower Protections and Incentives.

Experienced Washington DC Whistleblower Protection Attorneys

The experienced whistleblower attorneys at leading whistleblower law firm Zuckerman Law have substantial experience representing whistleblowers disclosing fraud and other wrongdoing at government contractors and grantees.  To schedule a free preliminary consultation, click here or call us at 202-262-8959.

Our experience includes:

In addition, we have substantial experience representing whistleblowers under the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) and enforcing the WPA, the law that the NDAA whistleblower provisions are based upon.  Two of the attorneys on our team served in senior position at the U.S. Office of Special Counsel overseeing investigations of whistleblower retaliation claims and whistleblower disclosures.

Before hiring a lawyer for a high-stakes whistleblower case, assess the lawyer’s reputation, prior experience representing whistleblowers, knowledge of whistleblower laws and prior results.  And consider the experience of other whistleblowers working with that attorney.  See our client testimonials by clicking here.

Zuckerman Law has written extensively about whistleblower protections for employees of government contractors and grantees, including the following articles and blog posts:

 

whistleblower_lawyers_012017_infographic
Whistleblower Protection Act
Tags: federal employee whistleblower protectionsfederal whistleblower protectionwhistleblower protection actwhistleblower protection attorneywhistleblower rights