• Our Team
    • Jason Zuckerman
    • Eric Bachman
    • Dallas Hammer
    • Matthew Stock, CPA
    • Katherine Krems
    • Locations
  • Services
    • Whistleblower Rewards and Bounties - SEC, CFTC, IRS and FCA
      • SEC Whistleblower Lawyers – Tier 1 Law Firm
      • International SEC Whistleblower Attorneys
      • SEC Whistleblower Attorney – Tier 1 Law Firm
      • CFTC Whistleblower Reward Lawyers
      • IRS Tax Fraud Whistleblower Reward Program
      • False Claims Act Resources for Whistleblowers
    • Sarbanes-Oxley Corporate Whistleblower Protection Law
      • Guide to Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Protection Law
      • Sarbanes Oxley Corporate Whistleblower Protections: Resource for Corporate Whistleblowers
    • Executive Employment Lawyers Virginia Maryland Washington DC
      • Severance Agreement Negotiations – Virginia Maryland Washington DC Employment Attorneys
      • Virginia Maryland Washington DC Non-Competition Agreement Attorneys
    • Whistleblower Retaliation and Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
      • Whistleblower Retaliation Jury Verdicts and Settlements
      • SEC Whistleblower Protections: Dodd-Frank and Sarbanes-Oxley Prohibitions Against Retaliation
      • Consumer Finance and Banking Whistleblower Protection Law
      • Accountant and Auditor Whistleblower Representation
      • Airline Industry Whistleblower Protection Law
      • Railroad Safety Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
      • Consumer Product Safety Whistleblower Attorneys
      • Code of Ethics Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
      • Nuclear Safety Whistleblower Protection Lawyer
      • Trucking Safety Whistleblower Protection Lawyer
      • SOX Corporate Whistleblower Protection Attorneys
      • Whistleblower Retaliation Damages and Remedies
      • Pipeline Safety Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
    • Top-Rated Discrimination Lawyers: Washington DC Maryland Virginia
      • Maryland employment discrimination lawyers
      • Northern Virginia Employment Attorneys
      • Washington DC Employment Lawyers
      • Glass Ceiling Discrimination Lawyer
      • Religious Discrimination Lawyers Washington DC Maryland Virginia
      • Equal Pay Act – Virginia Maryland DC Pay Discrimination Lawyers
      • Race Discrimination Attorneys
      • Pregnancy Discrimination Attorneys Maryland Virginia Washington DC
      • Age Discrimination Attorneys
      • ADA Disability Discrimination Lawyers: Serving Maryland, Washington DC and Virginia
      • LGBT Discrimination Lawyers
      • Frequently Asked Questions About Discrimination and Retaliation
    • Sexual Harassment Lawyers – Washington DC Maryland Virginia
      • Sexual harassment jury verdicts and settlements
  • Testimonials
  • Videos
    • SOX Whistleblower Protection FAQs
    • SEC Whistleblower Awards FAQs
    • FCA and NDAA Whistleblower Protection FAQs
    • Working with Zuckerman Law FAQs
  • Resources
    • Press
    • Articles
    • FAQ
    • eBooks - SOX Protection, SEC Awards and Sexual Harassment
    • Workplace Discrimination and Retaliation: Know Your Rights
  • Blog
    • Whistleblower Protection Law
    • Glass Ceiling Discrimination
  • Contact
Home
Home > Airline Industry Whistleblower Protection Law

Airline Industry Whistleblower Protection Law

need an attorney?
Image of Airline Industry Whistleblower Protection Law

Are whistleblowers in the airline industry protected against retaliation?

Yes, an employee of a section 44704 or 44705 FAA certificate holder or a contractor, subcontractor, or supplier of such holder is protected against retaliation for blowing the whistle on a law or regulation related to air carrier safety.

The AIR21 air safety whistleblower lawyers at Zuckerman Law represent whistleblowers in the aviation industry in AIR21 whistleblower retaliation claims under Section 519 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (also known as “AIR-21”).

To schedule a consultation with our experienced air safety  whistleblower lawyers, click here or call us at 202-262-8959.

Proving a Violation of AIR-21 Whistleblower Protection Provision

To prevail under AIR21, the whistleblower must prove:

  • the employee engaged in protected whistleblowing;
  • the employer was aware of the protected whistleblowing;
  • the employer took an adverse action; and
  • the protected whistleblowing was a contributing factor in the employer’s decision to take the adverse action.

A contributing factor is any factor which, alone or in combination with other factors, tends to affect in any way the outcome of the decision. Circumstantial evidence may include a wide variety of evidence, such as motive, bias, work pressures, past and current relationships of the involved parties, animus, temporal proximity, pretext, shifting explanations, and material changes in employer practices, among other types of evidence.

Once the complainant has proven these four elements, the employer may avoid liability only if it demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the same adverse personnel action in the absence of the whistleblowing.

Protected Air Safety Whistleblowing

As amended by the Aircraft Certification, Safety, and Accountability Act, AIR21 protects whistleblowers against retaliation for:

  • Disclosing a potential violation of any FAA order, regulation, or standard to an employer or the federal government;
  • Commencing a proceeding related to a potential violation of an airline safety regulation; or
  • Testifying, assisting, or participating in a proceeding related to a potential violation of an airline safety regulation.

Examples of protected disclosures include:

  • reporting a violation of the airline’s flight operations manual;
  • disclosing that an aircraft is not in airworthy condition;
  • identifying falsified FAI documentation (a violation of 14 C.F.R. §21.2(a));
  • opposing a violation of 14  C.F.R.  § 135.267(c), which limits pilots that conduct Part 135 operations from working more than 14 hours of duty  time;
  • reporting conduct that would result in “operating an aircraft in a careless or reckless manner so as to endanger the life or property of another”; and
  • reporting the use of an unsuitable part (a violation of  14 C.F.R. §3.5(c)(2)).

FAA regulations on airplane safety can be found here.

“As a matter law, an employee engages in protected activity any time [h]e provides or attempts to provide information related to a violation or alleged violation of an FAA requirement or any federal law related to air carrier safety, where the employee’s belief of a violation is subjectively and objectively reasonable.” Sewade v. Halo- Flight, Inc., ARB No. 13-098, slip op. at 7-8 (Feb. 13, 2015).  The “complainant must prove that he reasonably believed in the existence of a violation,” which entails both a subjective and an objective component. Burdette v. ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., ARB No. 14-059, slip op. at 5 (Jan. 21, 2016).

The complainant need not prove an actual violation of a regulation, order, or standard relating to air carrier safety, as long as the complainant’s belief in a violation is reasonable.  Furland v. Am. Airlines, Inc., ARB No. 90-102, ALJ No. 2008-AIR-011, slip op. at 5 (ARB July 27, 2011).  Also, the complainant need not convey his reasonable belief in order for it to be protected.  See Newell v. Airgas, Inc., ARB No. 16-007, ALJ No. 2015-STA-6, slip op. at 11 (ARB Jan. 10, 2018).

Prohibited Whistleblower Retaliation Under AIR21 Whistleblower Law

AIR21 prohibits a broad range of retaliatory acts that have a negative effect on the employee’s terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. This includes intimidating, threatening, restraining, coercing, blacklisting, or discharging a whistleblower.

An adverse employment action is one that would dissuade a reasonable worker from engaging in protected whistleblowing.  Suspension without pay is a way to dissuade employees from engaging in AIR21 protected conduct, and is therefore an adverse employment action.

Subjecting an employee to a 15D psychological evaluation can be an actionable adverse action where it is selectively implemented or utilized in a retaliatory fashion.

The DOL ARB has held “that the intended protection of AIR 21 extends beyond any limitations in Title VII and can extend beyond tangibility and ultimate employment actions.”  Williams v. American Airlines, ARB No. 09- 018, slip op. at 10-11 n.51 (Dec. 29, 2010)).  The ARB views “the list of prohibited activities in Section 1979.102(b) as quite broad and intended to include, as a matter law, reprimands (written or verbal), as well as counseling sessions by an air carrier, contractor or subcontractor, which are coupled with a reference of potential discipline.” Williams, ARB No. 09-018 at 10-11.  For example, “even paid administrative leave may be considered an adverse action under certain circumstances.” Id. at 14 (emphasis in original) (citing Van Der Meer v. Western Ky. Univ., ARB No. 97-078, slip op. at 4-5 (Apr. 20, 1998) (holding that “although an associate professor was paid throughout his involuntary leave of absence, he was subjected to adverse employment action by his removal from campus)).

Remedies for Airline Industry Workers in AIR21 Whistleblower Protection Cases

Under AIR-21, a prevailing whistleblower can recover:

  • Reinstatement;
  • Lost wages and benefits;
  • Compensatory damages for emotional distress and reputational harm; and
  • Attorney fees and litigation costs.

A mechanic who was fired for reporting insufficient maintenance on ambulance helicopters was awarded $485,000 in damages, plus attorney’s fees.

An airline that filed a retaliatory defamation lawsuit against nine whistleblowers was ordered to withdraw its lawsuit and pay $7.9 million in damages to the employees.

In Vieques Air Link, Inc. v. USDOL, No. 05-01278 (1st Cir. Feb. 2, 2006), the First Circuit affirmed a compensatory damages award of $50,000 for mental anguish where the complainant testified that he depleted his savings and struggled to support his wife and two infant children while he looked for a new full-time job following his termination.

How to File an AIR21 Aviation Safety Whistleblower Retaliation Action

An AIR-21 whistleblowing retaliation complaint must be filed initially with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) within 90 days of when the whistleblower knew or should have known of the retaliatory adverse action.

In 2015, the FAA and OSHA entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to facilitate cooperation concerning enforcement of the whistleblower protection provisions in AIR21.  The DOL and FAA both play a critical role in enforcing the whistleblower protection provision of AIR21. The FAA investigates complaints related to air carrier safety and enforces air safety regulations and issue sanctions to airmen and air carriers for noncompliance with these regulations.

Client Review of AIR21 Whistleblower Lawyer

The following is a review from an airline safety whistleblower client provided through Avvo:

  • I couldn’t ask for a better guy than Dallas Hammer to put the airlines feet to the fire. I had never heard of AIR21 until I had been retaliated against and educated my self with the help of Zuckerman Law website. Dallas correctly anticipated every move they made and we were in position to have a very strong case. Dallas negotiated a severance that is far above the norm. I am very pleased with the outcome. Now I can move on with my life with plenty of time to find a better employer.

Top-Rated Airline Safety Whistleblower Protection Lawyers

best whistleblower lawyers Before hiring an AIR21 whistleblower lawyer for a whistleblower retaliation case, assess the lawyer’s reputation, prior experience representing whistleblowers, knowledge of whistleblower laws and prior results.  And consider the experience of other whistleblowers working with that attorney.  We have extensive experience representing whistleblowers under a wide variety of corporate whistleblower protection laws.  See our client testimonials by clicking here.

  • U.S. News and Best Lawyers® have named Zuckerman Law a Tier 1 firm in Litigation – Labor and Employment in the Washington DC metropolitan area.
  • Both Eric Bachman and Jason Zuckerman served on the Department of Labor’s Whistleblower Protection Advisory Committee, which makes recommendations to the Secretary of Labor to improve OSHA’s administration of federal whistleblower protections.
  • Firm Principal Jason Zuckerman was recognized by Washingtonian magazine as a “Top Whistleblower Lawyer” in 2015, 2009, and 2007 selected by his peers to be included in The Best Lawyers in America® in the category of employment law (2011-2017), and selected by his peers to be listed in SuperLawyers (2012 and 2015-2017) in the category of labor and employment law.  is rated 10 out of 10 by Avvo, based largely on client reviews, and rated AV Preeminent® by Martindale-Hubbell based on peer reviews.
  • The firm has published extensively on whistleblower rights and protections, and speaks nationwide at seminars and continuing legal education conferences.  We blog about new developments under whistleblower retaliation and rewards laws at the Whistleblower Protection Blog.
  • The firm is routinely quoted in the media about whistleblower rights and protections.
  • Eric Bachman and Jason Zuckerman served in senior positions at the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, the federal agency charged with protecting whistleblowers in the federal government.  At OSC, they oversaw investigations of whistleblower claims and obtained corrective action or relief for whistleblowers.

To learn if you have a potential claim, call the whistleblower lawyers at Zuckerman Law at 202-262-8959.

whistleblower protection lawyers

ABOUT ZUCKERMAN LAW

Summary

We are a Washington, DC-based law firm that represents whistleblowers in whistleblower rewards and whistleblower retaliation matters and litigates discrimination claims on behalf of employees in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. The firm is dedicated to zealously advocating on behalf of our clients to achieve justice and accountability.

  • Professionalism
    (5)
  • Honesty
    (5)
  • Perseverance
    (5)
Overall
5
Sending
User Review
5 (1 vote)

One Response

  1. anonymous February 11, 2020

    I couldn’t ask for a better guy than Dallas Hammer to put the airlines feet to the fire. I had never heard of AIR21 until I had been retaliated against and educated my self with the help of Zuckerman Law website. Dallas correctly anticipated every move they made and we were in position to have a very strong case. Dallas negotiated a severance that is far above the norm. I am very pleased with the outcome. Now I can move on with my life with plenty of time to find a better employer.

Need an
attorney?

Call us at:

(202) 262-8959


Button to contact Zuckerman Law Whistleblower Lawyer

Recommended Posts

  • Pilot Prevails in AIR21 Whistleblower Retaliation Claim
  • OSHA Orders Pilot Reinstated in Airline Whistleblower Case
  • FAA and OSHA Enter into Agreement to Strengthen Enforcement of AIR21 Whistleblower Protection Law
  • Whistleblower Retaliation and Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
  • Whistleblower Protection Law and SEC Whistleblower Awards Blog
Zuckerman Law Avvo Rating
Best law firm Zuckerman
Zuckerman Law Best Whistleblower Lawyers
Jason Zuckerman Rated by Super Lawyers
Jason Zuckerman at Best Lawyers
Martindale AV Zuckerman Law Rating
Zuckerman Law Avvo Rating
Best law firm Zuckerman
Zuckerman Law Best Whistleblower Lawyers
Jason Zuckerman Rated by Super Lawyers
Jason Zuckerman at Best Lawyers
Martindale AV Zuckerman Law Rating

Discrimination

  • Workplace Discrimination and Retaliation: Know Your Rights
  • Top-Rated Sexual Harassment Attorneys Maryland Virginia Washington DC – Tier 1 Law Firm
  • Top-Rated Maryland Gender Discrimination Attorneys
  • Banking and Financial Services Sex Harassment and Discrimination Lawyers
  • Legal Help for Victims of Sexual Harassment
  • Top-Rated Bethesda-Chevy Chase Employment Attorneys
  • Workplace Discrimination and Retaliation: Know Your Rights
  • Race Discrimination Attorneys
  • Top-Rated Gender Discrimination Lawyers
  • Sexual harassment jury verdicts and settlements
  • ADA Disability Discrimination Lawyers: Serving Maryland, Washington DC and Virginia
  • Northern Virginia Employment Attorneys
  • Maryland employment discrimination lawyers
  • Pregnancy Discrimination Attorneys Maryland Virginia Washington DC
  • Age Discrimination Attorneys
  • LGBT Discrimination Attorneys for Federal Employees
  • Washington DC Sexual Orientation LGBTQ Discrimination Attorneys
  • LGBTQ Workplace Discrimination Lawyers
  • Virginia LGBT Discrimination Lawyers
  • Maryland LGBT Discrimination Attorneys
  • Glass Ceiling and Gender Discrimination Lawyer
  • Equal Pay Act – Virginia Maryland DC Pay Discrimination Lawyers
  • Religious Discrimination Lawyers Washington DC Maryland Virginia

SEC Whistleblower

  • Whistleblower Lawyers
  • Whistleblower Protection Law and SEC Whistleblower Awards Blog
  • Broker-Dealer Anti-Money Laundering Violations
  • SEC Whistleblower Attorney – Tier 1 Law Firm
  • Hedge Fund Fraud Whistleblower Attorneys
  • Dodd-Frank Corporate Whistleblower Protection
  • Washington DC SEC Whistleblower Lawyers
  • Inadequate Disclosure Whistleblower Attorneys
  • SEC Whistleblower Awards FAQs
  • Investment Adviser Fraud Whistleblower Lawyers
  • Unregistered Broker-Dealer SEC Whistleblower Lawyers
  • Securities Fraud and Ponzi Scheme Whistleblower Lawyers
  • CFTC Whistleblower Reward Lawyers
  • Accounting Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer
  • Foreign Bribery and FCPA Whistleblower Attorneys
  • Auditor Independence Whistleblower Lawyers
  • Inadequate Internal Accounting Controls Whistleblower Attorney
  • EB-5 Investment Fraud SEC Whistleblower Lawyers

Executive Employment Lawyer

  • Whistleblower Rewards and Bounties
  • Government Contractor Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
  • Federal Contractor Protection and Grantee NDAA Corporate Whistleblower Protection Law
  • Accounting Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer
  • Whistleblower Rights and Protections for C-Suite Executives
  • Free eBooks About Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Protection, SEC Whistleblower Program, Sexual Harassment, and Whistleblower Protection Act
  • Top-Rated False Claims Act Qui Tam Attorneys
  • Northern Virginia Employment Attorneys
  • Executive Employment Lawyers Virginia Maryland Washington DC
  • Severance Agreement Negotiations – Virginia Maryland Washington DC Employment Attorneys
  • Representing Whistleblowers Nationwide

Retaliation

  • SEC Whistleblower Retaliation: Tools to Combat Retaliation and Protect SEC Whistleblowers
  • Sarbanes Oxley Corporate Whistleblower Protections: Resource for Corporate Whistleblowers
  • Whistleblower Retaliation Jury Verdicts and Settlements
  • Whistleblower Retaliation Damages and Remedies
  • Whistleblower Retaliation
  • SOX Corporate Whistleblower Protection Attorneys
  • False Claims Act Whistleblower Retaliation Law (FAQs about False Claims Act Whistleblower Protection)
  • Compliance Officer Whistleblower Representation
  • Consumer Finance and Banking Whistleblower Protection Law
  • Federal Contractor Protection and Grantee NDAA Corporate Whistleblower Protection Law
  • SOX Whistleblower Protection FAQs
  • FCA and NDAA Whistleblower Protection FAQs
  • Sarbanes Oxley Corporate Whistleblower Protections: Resource for Corporate Whistleblowers
  • Guide to Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Protection Law
  • Maryland Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
  • Top-Rated Corporate Whistleblower Attorneys
  • Whistleblower Rights and Protections for C-Suite Executives

Important notice

Information contained in this website should not be relied on as legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice on your specific situation. Visiting this site or relying on information gleaned from the site does not create an attorney-client relationship with Zuckerman Law. Contacting Zuckerman Law or providing information to Zuckerman Law about a potential legal claim does not create an attorney-client relationship with Zuckerman Law. The content on this website is the property of Zuckerman Law and may not be used without the written consent thereof.

Zuckerman Law Washington DC Whistleblower Retaliation and Award Law Firm 1629 K St NW Ste 300 Washington, DC 20006 United States jzuckerman@zuckermanlaw.com (202) 262-8959
© 2021 Zuckerman Law, All Rights Reserved. Sitemap
Powered by powered by swapps swapps