Zuckerman Law Washington DC Whistleblower Retaliation and Award Law Firm

202-262-8959

  • Our Team
    • Jason Zuckerman
    • Eric Bachman
    • Dallas Hammer
    • Matthew Stock, CPA
    • Locations
  • Services
    • Sarbanes-Oxley Corporate Whistleblower Protection Law
      • Guide to Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Protection Law
      • Sarbanes Oxley Corporate Whistleblower Protections: Resource for Corporate Whistleblowers
    • Executive Employment Lawyers Virginia Maryland Washington DC
      • Severance Agreement Negotiations – Virginia Maryland DC Law Firm
      • Virginia Maryland Washington DC Non-Competition Agreement Attorneys
    • Whistleblower Rewards and Bounties – SEC, CFTC, IRS and FCA
      • SEC Whistleblower Lawyers – Tier 1 Law Firm
        • Washington DC SEC Whistleblower Attorney
        • Accounting Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer
        • Inadequate Internal Accounting Controls Whistleblower Attorney
        • Investment Fraud SEC Whistleblower Lawyers
        • Insider Trading SEC Whistleblower Attorneys
        • EB-5 Investment Fraud SEC Whistleblower Lawyers
        • Foreign Bribery and FCPA Whistleblower Attorneys
        • Investment Adviser Fraud Whistleblower Lawyers
        • Unregistered Broker-Dealer Whistleblower Lawyers
        • Broker-Dealer AML Violations
        • Ponzi Scheme Whistleblower Lawyers
        • Hedge Fund Fraud Whistleblower Attorneys
        • Inadequate Disclosure Whistleblower Attorneys
        • Deceptive Non-GAAP Accounting Whistleblower Lawyer
        • Auditor Independence Whistleblower Lawyers
        • Leading Lawyers Representing Cybersecurity Whistleblowers
        • Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Fraud SEC Whistleblower Attorneys
      • International SEC Whistleblower Attorneys
      • SEC Whistleblower Attorney – Tier 1 Law Firm
      • CFTC Whistleblower Reward Lawyers
        • Market Manipulation CFTC and SEC Whistleblower Lawyers
        • Swap Disclosure and Reporting Violations
      • IRS Tax Fraud Whistleblower Reward Program
      • False Claims Act Resources for Whistleblowers
    • Whistleblower Retaliation and Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
      • Whistleblower Jury Verdicts and Settlements
      • SEC Whistleblower Protections: Dodd-Frank and Sarbanes-Oxley Prohibitions Against Retaliation
      • Consumer Financial Whistleblower Protection Law
      • Accountant and Auditor Whistleblower Representation
      • Aviation Safety Whistleblower Protection Lawyer
      • Railroad Safety Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
      • Consumer Product Safety Whistleblower Attorneys
      • Code of Ethics Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
      • Nuclear Safety Whistleblower Protection Lawyer
      • Trucking Safety Whistleblower Protection Lawyer
      • SOX Corporate Whistleblower Protection Attorneys
      • Whistleblower Retaliation Damages and Remedies
      • Pipeline Safety Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
    • Whistleblower Protection Act Lawyer for Federal Employees
      • Veterans Affairs Whistleblower Lawyer – Help for VA Whistleblowers
      • Whistleblower Protection Act Individual Right of Action Appeals
    • Government Contractor Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
      • False Claims Act Whistleblower Retaliation Law (FAQs about FCA Whistleblower Protection)
      • Federal Contractor and Grantee NDAA Corporate Whistleblower Protection Law
    • Top-Rated Discrimination Lawyers: Washington DC Maryland Virginia
      • Glass Ceiling Discrimination Lawyers – Washington DC Maryland Virginia
      • Religious Discrimination Lawyers – Washington DC Maryland Virginia
      • Equal Pay Act Lawyers – Washington DC Maryland Virginia
      • Race Discrimination Attorneys
      • Pregnancy Discrimination Lawyers – Washington DC Maryland Virginia
      • Age Discrimination Lawyers – Washington DC Maryland Virginia
      • ADA Disability Discrimination Lawyers: Serving Maryland, Washington DC and Virginia
      • LGBT Discrimination Lawyers – Washington DC Maryland Virginia
        • Washington DC Sexual Orientation Discrimination Attorneys
        • LGBT Discrimination Attorneys for Federal Employees
      • Frequently Asked Questions About Discrimination and Retaliation
    • Sexual Harassment Lawyers – Washington DC Maryland Virginia
      • Sexual harassment jury verdicts and settlements
    • Maryland employment discrimination lawyers
      • Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law & Maryland Wage and Hour Law
      • Top-Rated Maryland Gender Discrimination Attorneys
      • Maryland Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
      • Maryland LGBT Discrimination Attorneys
    • Northern Virginia Employment Attorneys
      • Virginia Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
      • Virginia LGBT Discrimination Lawyers
    • Washington DC Employment Lawyers
  • Testimonials
  • Resources
    • Press
    • Articles
    • eBooks – SOX Protection, SEC Awards and Sexual Harassment
    • Whistleblower FAQ Videos
      • SOX Whistleblower Protection FAQs
      • SEC Whistleblower Awards FAQs
      • FCA and NDAA Whistleblower Protection FAQs
      • Working with Zuckerman Law FAQs
    • Workplace Discrimination and Retaliation: Know Your Rights
    • FAQ
  • Blog
    • Whistleblower Protection Law
    • Glass Ceiling Discrimination
  • Contact
  • FREE CONSULTATION
Home
Home > Whistleblower Retaliation Damages and Remedies

Whistleblower Retaliation Damages and Remedies

need an attorney? Our Offices Washington DC
Maryland
Virginia
Image of Whistleblower Retaliation Damages and Remedies

Find out How to Get the Maximum Damages in a Whistleblower Retaliation Case

SEC whistleblower lawyersThe whistleblower lawyers at Zuckerman Law have substantial experience litigating whistleblower protection and whistleblower reward cases. If you are seeking representation in a whistleblower case, click here, or call us at 202-262-8959 to schedule a free, confidential consultation.

Click here to read reviews from clients that we have represented in whistleblower rewards and whistleblower retaliation matters.

sox whistleblower attorneysIn 2017, Washingtonian magazine named two of our attorneys top whistleblower lawyers, and U.S. News and Best Lawyers® have named Zuckerman Law a Tier 1 firm in Litigation – Labor and Employment in the Washington DC metropolitan area.  Choosing the right whistleblower lawyer can make a major difference in the damages that you recover.

Whistleblower Retaliation Damages

Click here to learn more about anti-retaliation protections for SEC whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Act and Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Remedies in Whistleblower Retaliation Cases

Whistleblower retaliation can exact a serious toll, including lost pay and benefits, reputational harm and emotional distress.  Indeed, whistleblower retaliation can derail a career and deprive the whistleblower of millions of dollars in lost future earnings.

Whistleblowers should be rewarded for doing the right thing, but all too often they suffer retaliation and find themselves marginalized and ostracized.  Federal and state whistleblower laws provide several remedies to compensate whistleblowers that have suffered retaliation, including:

  • back pay (lost wages and benefits);
  • emotional distress damages;
  • damages for reputational harm;
  • reinstatement or front pay in lieu thereof;
  • lost future earnings; and
  • punitive damages.

Click here for examples of substantial verdicts and settlements in whistleblower retaliation cases.  Recently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed an award of approximately $3.2 million in a whistleblower protection case.

Back Pay in Whistleblower Retaliation Cases

Back pay is compensation for lost wages and benefits that the whistleblower would have earned absent the adverse employment action, offset by interim earnings.  A back pay awards may include all promotions and salary increases the complainant would have received in the absence of retaliation.  See, e.g., Welch v. Cardinal Bankshares Corp., 2003-SOX-15, at 17 (ALJ Feb. 15, 2005) (holding that a prevailing complainant “is entitled to all promotions and salary increases that he would have obtained but for the illegal discharge”) rev’d on other grounds, 536 F.3d 269 (4th Cir. 2008). The value of stock options is recoverable in SOX whistleblower cases.  Hagman v. Washington Mutual Bank, Inc., 2005-SOX-73, 2006 WL 6105301, *32 (Dec. 19, 2006).  

In addition to back pay, a prevailing whistleblower is entitled to prejudgment interest under certain whistleblower protection laws.  Prejudgment interest accrues from the time of the whistleblower’s termination to the time that the court entered judgment.

Under the False Claims Act whistleblower protection law and Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation provision, a prevailing whistleblower is entitled to recover double back pay.  In Mooney v. Americare, the court held that back pay is doubled before the court offsets the value of interim earnings (also known as mitigation).

Front Pay in Lieu of Reinstatement in Whistleblower Retaliation Cases

Reinstatement is the “presumptive and preferred remedy,” but where pronounced animosity between the parties leads both of them to advocate against reinstatement, front pay may be an appropriate substitute.  Front pay is designed to compensate the plaintiff for the time it would take to secure comparable employment. See, e.g., Hagman v. Washington Mutual Bank, Inc., ALJ Case No. 2005-SOX-00073, at 26–30 (ARB Dec. 19, 2006), appeal dismissed, ARB Case No. 07-039 (ARB May 23, 2007) (awarding $640,000 in front pay to a banker whose supervisor became verbally and physically threatening when the banker disclosed concerns about the short funding of construction loans).

Where a whistleblower demonstrates that he planned to continue working for the employer until he or she reached normal retirement age and demonstrates sufficient efforts to mitigate damages (find comparable employment), the whistleblower can been entitled to expected earnings to the date of retirement.  For example in the Perez v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals SOX whistleblower case, the court awarded approximately $2.7 in front pay.  That case is discussed in an article in Corporate Counsel titled How to Help a Whistleblower.

Front pay is an appropriate remedy in lieu of reinstatement in SOX whistleblower cases. See Jones v. SouthPeak Interactive Corp., 986 F. Supp. 2d 680 (E.D. Va. 2013), aff’d, 777 F.3d 658 (4th Cir. 2015). Andrea Jones worked at SouthPeak Interactive Corp. (“SouthPeak”) as its chief financial officer, and SouthPeak terminated her employment two days after she disclosed accounting irregularities to the SEC. Following a four-day trial, a jury found for Jones and awarded nearly $700,000 in damages. Jones then filed a motion seeking front pay in lieu of reinstatement and in addition to compensatory damages. Judge Payne awarded front pay, and noted the following:

Front pay also has been more precisely defined as “a lump sum … representing the discounted present value of the difference between the earnings [an employee] would have received in his old employment and the earnings he can be expected to receive in his present and future, and by hypothesis, inferior, employment.” McKnight v. Gen. Motors Corp., 908 F.2d 104, 116 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 919, 111 S.Ct. 1306, 113 L.Ed.2d 241 (1991), partially superseded by Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub.L. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1071 (codified at 42 U.S.C. 1981 et seq.). If a plaintiff has been diverted onto a less profitable career path through the unlawful actions of his former employer, an award of front pay to compensate the plaintiff until such time as he can regain his former career track is not a windfall.

SouthPeak appealed Judge Payne’s decision. The DOL filed an amicus curiae brief arguing that front pay is an appropriate remedy under SOX, and the Fourth Circuit affirmed. See 777 F.3d at 663.

In calculating front pay, courts should apply the following guiding principles:

  • “It is well settled that `the risk of lack of certainty with respect to projections of lost income must be borne by the wrongdoer, not the victim.” Bartek v. Urban Redevelop ent Authority, 882 F.2d 739, 746 (3d Cir. 1989).
  • The Court should “assume, absent evidence to the contrary, that the illegally discharged employee would have continued working for the employer until he or she reached normal retirement age.”  See Perez v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 204 F. Supp. 3d 528 (S.D.N.Y. 2016).

Special Damages/Compensatory Damages in Whistleblower Retaliation Cases

The SOX whistleblower protection law and similar corporate whistleblower protection laws authorizes the award of not only economic damages, but also “special damages” which includes damages for emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation and injury to reputation.  See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Admin. Rev. Bd., 717 F.3d 1121, 1138 (10th Cir. 2013) (upholding an award of “noneconomic compensatory damages” for “emotional pain and suffering, mental anguish, and humiliation”).  As a federal judge held in Hanna v. WCI Communities, Inc., 348 F.Supp.2d 1332 (S.D.Fla.2004), a SOX whistleblower case, “[w]hen reputational injury caused by an employer’s unlawful discrimination diminishes a plaintiff’s future earnings capacity, [he] cannot be made whole without compensation for the lost future earnings [he] would have received absent the employer’s unlawful activity.”

“[A] plaintiff’s testimony, standing alone, can support an award of compensatory damages, [but] the evidence of the emotional distress must be demonstrable, genuine, and adequately explained.”  Price v. City of Charlotte, N.C., 93 F.3d 1241, 1251-52 (4th Cir. 1996).  The whistleblower’s testimony “must indicate with specificity how the plaintiff’s alleged distress manifested itself.” Bryant v. Aiken Reg’l Med. Ctrs., 333 F.3d 536, 547 (4th Cir. 2003) (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted).

Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Whistleblower Jury Verdicts

Recently, a California jury awarded former Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. General Counsel Sanford Wadler $11M in his Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower retaliation lawsuit.  Approximately $3M of the award is for back pay and the remaining amount is for punitive damages.  Under the Dodd-Frank Act, backpay will likely be doubled.  Wadler worked as GC at Bio-Rad for approximately 25 years.  He blew the whistle internally by reporting potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”).  Bio-Rad investigated Wadler’s disclosures and concluded that there was no evidence of either a violation or an attempted violation of the FCPA.  In June 2013, Bio-Rad terminated Wadler’s employment due to alleged poor work performance and behavior.The jury verdict in the Wadler SOX case appears to be the highest award to date under the whistleblower protection provision of SOX.  There are approximately three other SOX whistleblower cases that resulted in damages in excess of $2M:

  • In 2014, a California jury awarded $6 million to Catherine Zulfer in her SOX whistleblower retaliation action against Playboy, Inc. (“Playboy”). Zulfer v. Playboy Enters. Inc., JVR No. 1405010041, 2014 WL 1891246 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2014). Zulfer, a former accounting executive, alleged that Playboy had terminated her in retaliation for raising concerns about executive bonuses to Playboy’s chief financial officer (“CFO”) and chief compliance officer (“CCO”). She contended that she had been instructed by Playboy’s CFO to set aside $1 million for executive bonuses that had not been approved by the board of directors. Zulfer refused to carry out this instruction, warning Playboy’s General Counsel that the bonuses were contrary to Playboy’s internal controls over financial reporting. After Zulfer’s disclosure, the CFO retaliated by ostracizing Zulfer, excluding her from meetings, forcing her to take on additional duties, and eventually terminating her employment. After a short trial, a jury awarded Zulfer $6 million in compensatory damages and also ruled that Zulfer was entitled to punitive damages. Id. Zulfer and Playboy reached a settlement before a determination of punitive damages.
  • In 2016, Dr. Perez, a former senior manager of pharmaceutical chemistry at Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Progenics”), recovered a total of $5M in a SOX whistleblower case.  Perez alleged that Progenics terminated his employment in retaliation for his disclosure to Progenics executives that the company was committing fraud against shareholders by making inaccurate representations about the results of a clinical trial.  Dr. Perez represented himself at trial.  Corporate Counsel magazine reported on the case in an article titled: How to Help a Whistleblower.
  • In 2013, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a SOX jury verdict awarding $2.2 million in damages, plus $2.4 million in attorney’s fees, to two former in-house counsel. Van Asdale v. Int’l Game Tech., 549 F. App’x 611, 614 (9th Cir. Sept. 27, 2013). Shawn and Lena Van Asdale, both former in-house counsel at International Game Technology (“IGT”), alleged that they had been terminated in retaliation for disclosing shareholder fraud related to IGT’s merger with rival game company Anchor Gaming (“Anchor”). Specifically, the Van Asdales alleged that Anchor had withheld important information about its value, causing IGT to commit shareholder fraud by paying above market value to acquire Anchor. Van Asdale v. Int’l Game Tech., 577 F.3d 989, 992 (9th Cir. 2009). When the Van Asdales discovered the issue, they brought their concerns about the potential fraud to their boss, who had served as Anchor’s general counsel prior to the merger. IGT terminated both plaintiffs shortly thereafter.

SOX Whistleblower Lawyer’s Guide to Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protection Law

The whistleblower protection provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides robust protection to corporate whistleblowers, and indeed some SOX whistleblowers have achieved substantial recoveries. On the fifteenth anniversary of SOX, leading whistleblower law firm Zuckerman Law released a free guide to the SOX whistleblower protection law: “Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protection: Robust Protection for Corporate Whistleblowers.”  

The guide summarizes SOX whistleblower protections and offers concrete tips for corporate whistleblowers based on lessons learned during years of litigating SOX whistleblower cases.

Call Leading Whistleblower Lawyers Today

We have assembled a team of leading whistleblower lawyers to provide top-notch representation to whistleblowers.  Recently Washingtonian magazine named Jason Zuckerman and Eric Bachman top whistleblower lawyers.  Both Bachman and Zuckerman served in senior positions at the Office of Special Counsel, where they oversaw investigations of whistleblower retaliation claims and whistleblower disclosures, and enforced the Whistleblower Protection Act.  Let us put our unique experience and credentials to work for you:

  • U.S. News and Best Lawyers® have named Zuckerman Law a Tier 1 firm in Litigation – Labor and Employment in the Washington DC metropolitan area
  • Bachman and Zuckerman served on the Department of Labor’s Whistleblower Protection Advisory Committee, which makes recommendations to the Secretary of Labor to improve OSHA’s administration of federal whistleblower protections.
  • Matt Stock is a Certified Public Accountant, Certified Fraud Examiner and former KPMG external auditor.  As an auditor, Mr. Stock developed an expertise in financial statement analysis, internal controls testing and fraud recognition, and he uses his auditing experience to help whistleblowers investigate and disclose complex financial frauds to the government and obtain damages for retaliation.  He is lead author of SEC Whistleblower Program: Tips from SEC Whistleblower Attorneys to Maximize an SEC Whistleblower Award.
  • Jason Zuckerman was recognized by Washingtonian magazine as a “Top Whistleblower Lawyer” in 2017, 2015, 2009, and 2007 selected by his peers to be included in The Best Lawyers in America® in the category of employment law (2011-2017), and selected by his peers to be listed in SuperLawyers (2012 and 2015-2017) in the category of labor and employment law.  is rated 10 out of 10 by Avvo, based largely on client reviews, and rated AV Preeminent® by Martindale-Hubbell based on peer reviews.
  • Eric Bachman has substantial experience litigating precedent-setting employment cases.  His wins include a $100 million settlement in a disparate impact Title VII class action and a $16 million class action settlement against a major grocery chain.  Having served as Special Litigation Counsel in the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice and as lead or co-counsel in numerous jury trials, Bachman is ready to go the distance to obtain the relief that you deserve.
  • The firm has published extensively on whistleblower rights and protections, and regularly speaks nationwide at seminars and continuing legal education conferences.  We blog about new developments in whistleblower law at the Whistleblower Protection Blog.

 

Recommended Posts

  • SEC Whistleblower Attorney - Report EB-5 Investment Fraud
    NDAA Provides Robust Whistleblower Protection

    Whistleblower Protections for Employees of Government Contractors and Grantees July 2015 marks the second anniversary…

  • FAR Amendment Bars Agencies from Subsidizing Whistleblower Retaliation
    FAR Amendment Bars Agencies from Subsidizing Whistleblower Retaliation

      For too long, taxpayers have been subsidizing whistleblower retaliation by paying legal costs incurred…

  • Washington DC Whistleblower protection lawyer
    Legal Services

    Whistleblower Protection and Employment Discrimination Legal Services Zuckerman Law is a Washington, DC-based law firm…

  • remedies for whistleblowers
    Whistleblower Obtains Restraining Order to Halt Retaliation

      On April 15th, 2015, a whistleblower working at an Alabama plant that produces foam cushions…

  • employee right in internal investigations
    Whistleblower Lawyer Zuckerman Quoted About OSHA Whistleblower Investigations

    A Bloomberg-BNA article entitled New Whistle-Blower Investigation Guidance From OSHA quotes leading whistleblower lawyer Jason Zuckerman whistleblower…

  • SEC Whistleblower Lawyers
    Whistleblower Protection Law Blog

Need an
attorney?

Call us at:

(202) 262-8959


Button to contact Zuckerman Law Whistleblower Lawyer

Recommended Posts

  • NDAA Provides Robust Whistleblower Protection
  • FAR Amendment Bars Agencies from Subsidizing Whistleblower Retaliation
  • Legal Services
  • Whistleblower Obtains Restraining Order to Halt Retaliation
  • Whistleblower Lawyer Zuckerman Quoted About OSHA Whistleblower Investigations
  • Whistleblower Protection Law Blog
Zuckerman Law Avvo Rating
Best law firm Zuckerman
Zuckerman Law Best Whistleblower Lawyers
Jason Zuckerman Rated by Super Lawyers
Jason Zuckerman at Best Lawyers
Martindale AV Zuckerman Law Rating
Zuckerman Law Avvo Rating
Best law firm Zuckerman
Zuckerman Law Best Whistleblower Lawyers
Jason Zuckerman Rated by Super Lawyers
Jason Zuckerman at Best Lawyers
Martindale AV Zuckerman Law Rating

Discrimination

  • Workplace Discrimination and Retaliation: Know Your Rights
  • Top-Rated Sexual Harassment Attorneys Maryland Virginia Washington DC – Tier 1 Law Firm
  • Top-Rated Maryland Gender Discrimination Attorneys
  • Banking and Financial Services Sex Harassment and Discrimination Lawyers
  • Legal Help for Victims of Sexual Harassment
  • Top-Rated Bethesda-Chevy Chase Employment Attorneys
  • Workplace Discrimination and Retaliation: Know Your Rights
  • Race Discrimination Attorneys
  • Top-Rated Gender Discrimination Lawyers
  • Sexual harassment jury verdicts and settlements
  • ADA Disability Discrimination Lawyers: Serving Maryland, Washington DC and Virginia
  • Northern Virginia Employment Attorneys
  • Maryland employment discrimination lawyers
  • Pregnancy Discrimination Attorneys Maryland Virginia Washington DC
  • Age Discrimination Attorneys
  • LGBT Discrimination Attorneys for Federal Employees
  • Washington DC Sexual Orientation Discrimination Attorneys
  • LGBT Discrimination Lawyers
  • Virginia LGBT Discrimination Lawyers
  • Maryland LGBT Discrimination Attorneys
  • Glass Ceiling Discrimination Lawyer
  • Equal Pay Act – Virginia Maryland DC Pay Discrimination Lawyers
  • Religious Discrimination Lawyers Washington DC Maryland Virginia

SEC Whistleblower

  • Whistleblower Lawyers
  • Whistleblower Protection Law Blog
  • Broker-Dealer Anti-Money Laundering Violations
  • SEC Whistleblower Attorney – Tier 1 Law Firm
  • Hedge Fund Fraud Whistleblower Attorneys
  • Dodd-Frank Corporate Whistleblower Protection
  • Washington DC SEC Whistleblower Lawyers
  • Inadequate Disclosure Whistleblower Attorneys
  • SEC Whistleblower Awards FAQs
  • Investment Adviser Fraud Whistleblower Lawyers
  • Unregistered Broker-Dealer SEC Whistleblower Lawyers
  • Securities Fraud and Ponzi Scheme Whistleblower Lawyers
  • CFTC Whistleblower Reward Lawyers
  • Accounting Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer
  • Foreign Bribery and FCPA Whistleblower Attorneys
  • Auditor Independence Whistleblower Lawyers
  • Inadequate Internal Accounting Controls Whistleblower Attorney
  • EB-5 Investment Fraud SEC Whistleblower Lawyers

Executive Employment Lawyer

  • Whistleblower Rewards and Bounties
  • Government Contractor Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
  • Federal Contractor and Grantee NDAA Corporate Whistleblower Protection Law
  • Accounting Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer
  • Whistleblower Rights and Protections for C-Suite Executives
  • Free eBooks About Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Protection, SEC Whistleblower Program, Sexual Harassment, and Whistleblower Protection Act
  • Top-Rated False Claims Act Qui Tam Attorneys
  • Northern Virginia Employment Attorneys
  • Executive Employment Lawyers Virginia Maryland Washington DC
  • Severance Agreement Negotiations – Virginia Maryland Washington DC Employment Attorneys
  • Representing Whistleblowers Nationwide

Retaliation

  • SEC Whistleblower Retaliation: Tools to Combat Retaliation and Protect SEC Whistleblowers
  • Sarbanes Oxley Corporate Whistleblower Protections: Resource for Corporate Whistleblowers
  • Whistleblower Jury Verdicts and Settlements
  • Whistleblower Retaliation Damages and Remedies
  • Whistleblower Retaliation
  • SOX Corporate Whistleblower Protection Attorneys
  • False Claims Act Whistleblower Retaliation Law (FAQs about False Claims Act Whistleblower Protection)
  • Compliance Officer Whistleblower Representation
  • Consumer Finance and Banking Whistleblower Protection Law
  • Federal Contractor and Grantee NDAA Corporate Whistleblower Protection Law
  • SOX Whistleblower Protection FAQs
  • FCA and NDAA Whistleblower Protection FAQs
  • Sarbanes Oxley Corporate Whistleblower Protections: Resource for Corporate Whistleblowers
  • Guide to Sarbanes Oxley Whistleblower Protection Law
  • Maryland Whistleblower Protection Lawyers
  • Top-Rated Corporate Whistleblower Attorneys
  • Whistleblower Rights and Protections for C-Suite Executives

Important notice

Information contained in this website should not be relied on as legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice on your specific situation. Visiting this site or relying on information gleaned from the site does not create an attorney-client relationship with Zuckerman Law. Contacting Zuckerman Law or providing information to Zuckerman Law about a potential legal claim does not create an attorney-client relationship with Zuckerman Law. The content on this website is the property of Zuckerman Law and may not be used without the written consent thereof.

Zuckerman Law Washington DC Whistleblower Retaliation and Award Law Firm 1629 K St NW Ste 300 Washington, DC 20006 United States jzuckerman@zuckermanlaw.com (202) 262-8959
© 2019 Zuckerman Law, All Rights Reserved. Sitemap
Powered by powered by swapps swapps
Follow via Facebook Follow via Linkedin Follow via Twitter Follow via Google