After a whistleblower applies for an SEC whistleblower award (by submitting a completed Form WB-APP within 90 calendar days of the SEC posting the Notice of Covered Action), the SEC Whistleblower Office’s Claims Review Staff will review the application in accordance with the rules of the SEC Whistleblower Program and make a preliminary award determination. The Claims Review Staff may base this determination on:
After the Claims Review Staff makes its preliminary determination (recommending whether to issue an award and the proposed award amount), it will send the whistleblower a written notification of the determination and an explanation of the whistleblower’s rights in the awards claims process. At this point, the whistleblower will have 30 calendar days to:
If you are seeking representation in applying for an SEC whistleblower award or appealing an award determination, call us for a free, confidential consultation at 202-262-8959.
We are a leading firm representing SEC whistleblowers worldwide and have secured multi-million dollar awards for SEC whistleblowers. Click below to hear SEC whistleblower lawyer Matt Stock’s tips for SEC whistleblowers:
Recently the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners published a profile of Matt Stock’s success working with whistleblowers to fight fraud:
Whistleblowers may appeal the Claims Review Staff’s preliminary determination to deny an award or, in the event the preliminary determination recommends the granting of an award, the amount of the award. Whistleblowers must appeal the determination within 60 calendar days of the later of: (i) the date of the preliminary award determination, or (ii) the date when the SEC Whistleblower Office made materials available for review.
If a whistleblower chooses to appeal the preliminary determination, they will receive a written acknowledgment that the SEC Whistleblower Office received the appeal. Thereafter, the Claims Review Staff will consider the whistleblower’s response, along with any supporting documentation provided, and will make its proposed final determination. See Rule 21-F10.
If a whistleblower chooses not to appeal a preliminary determination, or fails to appeal in a timely manner, the preliminary determination will become the SEC’s final order (except where the preliminary determination recommends granting an award, in which case it will become a proposed final determination). Importantly, a whistleblower’s failure to contest a preliminary determination will constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and the whistleblower will be prohibited from appealing the determination to a United States Court of Appeals. See Rule 21-F10.
Finally, after the preliminary determination becomes the proposed final determination, the whistleblower and the SEC will receive written notification of the determination. Within 30 days of receiving this notification, any Commissioner can request a full review of the proposed final determination. If there is no request within 30 days, the proposed final determination will become the SEC’s final order, which will be promptly forwarded to the whistleblower.
For more information about the SEC’s claims review process and analysis of award applications, see the SEC’s opposition brief, which was filed in response to a whistleblower’s petition for mandamus alleging that the SEC denied him justice by unreasonably delaying a preliminary determination on his claim for a whistleblower award.
If the SEC denies an award to a whistleblower, the whistleblower may file an appeal in an appropriate United States Court of Appeals (either the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, or to the circuit where the aggrieved person resides or has his or her principal place of business) within 30 days of the decision being issued. In Doe v. SEC, the court held the standard of review for an appeal of the SEC’s denial of an award is whether the SEC’s determination was based on “substantial evidence.” Doe v. SEC, 2018 U.S. App. Lexis 7449 No. 16-1414 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 20, 2018).
If the SEC issues an award to the whistleblower of between 10 to 30 percent of the monetary actions collected in the action, the whistleblower may not appeal the award determination if the award was made in accordance with subsection (b). See Rule 21F-13.
For more information about whistleblower rewards and bounties, contact the SEC whistleblower lawyers at leading SEC whistleblower firm Zuckerman Law at 202-262-8959.
To learn more about the SEC Whistleblower Program, download Zuckerman Law’s eBook: SEC Whistleblower Program: Tips from SEC Whistleblower Attorneys to Maximize an SEC Whistleblower Award:
The monetary sanctions from which the SEC determines the amount of an award is not always equal to the penalty or other sanctions set forth in an enforcement action. Sometimes the defendant is unable to pay the sanction and the SEC waives part of the penalty. If the covered action assesses a penalty in excess of $1M, the whistleblower is eligible for an award, but monetary sanctions from which an award is determined is limited to the amount that the SEC actually collects.
whistleblower_lawyers_012017_infographic
