Image of Do formal rules of evidence apply in Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower trials at the Department of Labor?

Do formal rules of evidence apply in Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower trials at the Department of Labor?

Formal rules of evidence do not apply in Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower cases, but Department of Labor Administrative Law Judges will apply rules or principles designed to assure production of the most probative evidence.  29 CFR § 1980.107(d).  The OALJ has adopted rules of evidence that are substantially similar to the Federal Rules of Evidence.  See 29 CFR § 18.101 et seq.  An ALJ may exclude evidence that is immaterial, irrelevant, or unduly repetitious.

In Leznik v. Nektar Therapeutics, Inc., 2006-SOX-93 (ALJ Feb. 9, 2007) (Order Granting Motion to Compel), the ALJ noted that “[u]nlike matters that may ultimately proceed to a jury trial, evidence is broadly admissible at Sarbanes-Oxley hearings under the Secretary’s aegis, where formal rules of evidence play no role.  The presiding administrative law judge may exclude only what is ‘immaterial, irrelevant, or unduly repetitious,’ taking care to see that ‘the most probative evidence’ is produced.”  Id. at 5 (citing 29 C.F.R. § 1980.107(d))

If you are seeking representation in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower case, contact the experienced SOX whistleblower lawyers at Zuckerman Law by clicking here, or calling us at 202-262-8959 to schedule a free preliminary consultation.

 

whistleblower_lawyers_012017_infographic

 

Avatar of Jason Zuckerman

Jason Zuckerman, Principal of Zuckerman Law, litigates whistleblower retaliation, qui tam, wrongful discharge, and other employment-related claims. He is rated 10 out of 10 by Avvo, was recognized by Washingtonian magazine as a “Top Whistleblower Lawyer” in 2015 and selected by his peers to be included in The Best Lawyers in America® and in SuperLawyers.