Image of ARB Decision Underscores the Broad Scope of Whistleblower Protection for Airline Employees

ARB Decision Underscores the Broad Scope of Whistleblower Protection for Airline Employees

The Department of Labor Administrative Board’s decision in Bondurant v. Southwest Airlines underscores the broad scope of whistleblower protection for airline employees under the AIR21 whistleblower protection law.

Bondurant brought a claim under AIR21 alleging that Southwest terminated his employment in response to concerns he raised about violations of FAA rules. A DOL administrative law judge dismissed the case on the ground that Bondurant did not engage in protected conduct under AIR21. On appeal the ARB vacated the ALJ’s decision and remanded the case to the ALJ for further proceedings.

Bondurant alleged that he engaged in protected conduct by raising concerns about Southwest transporting air cargo in a manner that did not comply with FAA rules, including Southwest transporting an unsafe box of lithium batteries. The ALJ found that Bondurant failed to establish that he engaged in AIR21 whistleblowing because Bondurant failed to demonstrate that he communicated to Southwest the basis for his belief that Southwest was violating FAA rules. According to the ALJ, “[i]t is not enough that a complainant honestly and reasonably believed there was or would be a violation. He must also have communicated that concern and the essence of Respondent’s Motion is that there is nothing in the record to allow a finding of fact to decide that he did so.”

The ARB, however, found that the ALJ’s interpretation of AIR21 protected conduct is flawed in two respects. First, a complainant need not actually convey his or her reasonable belief to the employer.  “The reasonable belief standard requires an examination of the reasonableness of a complainant’s beliefs, but not whether the complainant actually communicated the reasonableness of those beliefs to management or the authorities.”

Second, Bondurant proved that he reported to upper management that Southwest had transported lithium batteries in an unsafe manner, which was sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact with respect to protected activity.

The ARB’s clarification of the relatively low threshold to establish protected conduct highlights the broad scope of protection that AIR21 affords to whistleblowers in the aviation industry.

AIR21 Whistleblower Remedies

Client Review of AIR21 Whistleblower Protection Lawyer

The following are reviews from airline safety whistleblower clients provided through Avvo:

  • I couldn’t ask for a better guy than Dallas Hammer to put the airline’s feet to the fire. I had never heard of AIR21 until I had been retaliated against and educated myself with the help of Zuckerman Law website. Dallas correctly anticipated every move they made and we were in a position to have a very strong case. Dallas negotiated a severance that is far above the norm. I am very pleased with the outcome. Now I can move on with my life with plenty of time to find a better employer.

Top-Rated AIR21 Whistleblower Protection Lawyers

To learn more about whistleblower protections for employees in the airline industry, contact the whistleblower lawyers at Zuckerman Law at 202-262-8959We have obtained substantial relief for air safety whistleblowers in AIR21 whistleblower cases.

See our client testimonials by clicking hereU.S. News and Best Lawyers® have named Zuckerman Law a Tier 1 firm in Litigation – Labor and Employment in the Washington DC metropolitan area.


Jason Zuckerman, Principal of Zuckerman Law, litigates whistleblower retaliation, qui tam, wrongful discharge, and other employment-related claims. He is rated 10 out of 10 by Avvo, was recognized by Washingtonian magazine as a “Top Whistleblower Lawyer” in 2015 and selected by his peers to be included in The Best Lawyers in America® and in SuperLawyers.